Comments on: Michael Moorcock: Gloriana http://www.needsmoredemonsornot.com/content/alphabetical-author/m-author/michael-moorcock-gloriana/ irreverent opinions on books Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:46:55 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: villain http://www.needsmoredemonsornot.com/content/alphabetical-author/m-author/michael-moorcock-gloriana/comment-page-1/#comment-4411 villain Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:27:55 +0000 http://www.needsmoredemonsornot.com/content/alphabetical-author/m-author/michael-moorcock-gloriana/#comment-4411 I'm probably over-reacting. I’m probably over-reacting.

]]> By: Tim Walters http://www.needsmoredemonsornot.com/content/alphabetical-author/m-author/michael-moorcock-gloriana/comment-page-1/#comment-4408 Tim Walters Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:59:45 +0000 http://www.needsmoredemonsornot.com/content/alphabetical-author/m-author/michael-moorcock-gloriana/#comment-4408 Hm. I always cite this as my favorite Moorcock fantasy novel despite not having read it since I was a teenager. I don't remember it being *that* nasty, but probably I've just repressed it--all I can recall is the cool Peake-y mannered weirdness of it. I should read it again and see how I feel now. If you want to give him another chance, <i>Mother London</i> is kinder, gentler Moorcock, and a great book. Not fantasy, though. Hm. I always cite this as my favorite Moorcock fantasy novel despite not having read it since I was a teenager. I don’t remember it being *that* nasty, but probably I’ve just repressed it–all I can recall is the cool Peake-y mannered weirdness of it. I should read it again and see how I feel now.

If you want to give him another chance, Mother London is kinder, gentler Moorcock, and a great book. Not fantasy, though.

]]>